Showing posts with label Electric Shadows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electric Shadows. Show all posts

Friday, December 16, 2011

Film: Electric Shadows, Part II


I finalize Part II with a suggestion. Thoreau spoke of active listening as well as active talking. What about interactive reading and watching of films?

Call me mad, but the early monks of the Franciscan order directed the sacred text to themselves. They read aloud, alone, engaging in a dialogue with the words. “Let not the sun go down on your wrath.” Lord, I went to bed last night, angry with Abba Tomas; we don’t agree about how loud the liturgy should be sung. What happens inside my heart if I defer and sing louder, as he wishes?

“Please, let the sun not set on my now uneasy heart.” Peaceful, relevant application. And so what of film? What does Ling Ling find in film that life cannot provide? How does film finally bring her and her Maoist-frenzied childhood friend together [in a park, near water, of course]? Born a child of disgrace, she becomes jealous of  her baby brother, born to her mother and new father, “Uncle Pan,” the projectionist for the popular outdoor films he shows each night. When she does more to attract her parent’s attention, she receives a beating, which leaves her deaf.

Because films order the world in two hours, they are an order principle in our own lives. Of course we suspend time and logic. If we can’t, go ahead and read a book on physics and forget the film. She becomes a runaway, living, ironically, down the street from her parents. She writes in her journal, “if my life were a movie, I’d be the only one watching it.” Loneliness? I think of those lines when I write one of these blogs. This insight, easily topped by the famous Groucho Marx lament: “I wouldn’t want to be a member of any club that would have me for a member.” Electric Shadows captures loneliness, deafness, alienation, but it also captures love and reconciliation.  Let the camera do its work as it helps you pick up the hints.

Jiang also helps us with symbols:  Cameras, film, binoculars—all capturing the theme of perception and misperception. Here comes the old Scot, Robert Burns: “O would power gie us, the gift to see ourselves as eithers see us.” That honing of the senses begins with film when they are very young.

While my mother and I walked home from My Foolish HeartI kept thinking about something children can’t get their minds around:  Love. How could the beautiful Susan Hayworth weep so much over a man, now gone? I was 8 at the time.

Ok, I admit it. In my privacy while watching Electric Shadows, I put myself in the film. How would I have treated the outcast and beautiful Jiang Yihong, disgraced by a pregnancy, deserted by her lover, a Red Guard enthusiast, more obsessed with a fat man who killed hundreds of thousands of people as Chairman and wrote 20 pages of political and economic nonsense that sent an entire nation into madness, than the woman he loves, the child, the new little human who is his responsibility?

Could I escape the rabid world of the Red Revolution? Would I have ceased being human had I lived then?

How precious are the shadows that invade my mind, as I lie abed, drifting into sleep. How could that angel wife of mine and I join forces and help such “fallen” souls? How would we help mend broken hearts and deep wounds of those hearts and souls? Well, first, we would want a landscape as background—a brook, trees, and a little bridge, a place to sit. We’ll need the mothers and fathers of such lost runaways. Carolyn, critical in these tender moments, would hold the crying woman without a mother. She would lay her head on her lap and stroke her forehead.  I would sit near, and in perfect Cantonese I would begin the words of comfort.

“You are not really responsible for all of this.  Let me tell you the rest of your story--the part you don’t know. .  . .”




Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Film: Electric Shadows, Part I


How is the weather where you are?  My Idaho friends are watching the red line head for zero. Here in Austin, we’ve had rain but pray and dance for more. We need a drought-buster! Cold, overcast and windy.  A perfect day for a film.

Let me suggest the Chinese version of Woody Allen’s, The Purple Rose of Cairo. The Mia Farrow character, who has nothing in her life but her imagination at the local theater, literally loses herself in the film.  Finally, the Jeff Daniels character joyfully steps off the screen, walks down the aisle, takes her by the hand, and they walk out of the theater and into life.  The question Xiao Jiang raises in his first directed film, Electric Shadows, is what is the role of the imagination in our lives?

You think that is a non-question, or one you’re too busy to answer during the Christmas rush.  Really? Your children, well the children in my time, “dreamed with visions of sugar plums dancing in their heads.” Actually, I’ve never seen a sugarplum and have never bought a single plum that I could eat. Too sour. Beware of such promising fruit as apricots and plums, unless someone is lucky enough to live south enough to grow them.

Ask yourself while you’re unloading all those electronic machines just what your children are dreaming about. Forget the sugarplums. Your children want more screens, more ways to escape into a world of imagination ready-made for them. They don’t have to slip into those “free and easy, apple orchard days” Dylan Thomas, the poet writes about.

A new Apple will soon replace those “apple orchard” dreams. Your children are entering a world Aldous Huxley already built for you in 1936:  A Brave New World. The new virtual reality isn’t even your own God-endowed mind moving you to other worlds of thought. The “Feelies,” he wrote of, will take you into a tactile experience more real than their minds could ever mold.

Sad—and true.  Does the human imagination have a function beyond escape? A friend of mine said that she didn’t think I would have “survived my life as I have without my lively imagination.”

Let’s settle for her definition: Imagination enables us to survive. Of course, a twisted, corrupted imagination sends us to crime, prison and death. Or if we high center on that screen filled with impossibly half-clad women [also seen on airport paperbacks], we are simply paralyzed. Those gals are not real, anyway:  They are pixels, dots that shape an image. You’ve fallen in lust with an idol.

I plea for a richly textured religious imagination. Such a shaping force builds a possible world for me:  One that is lively, inspiring. That shaping force William Coleridge, companion to William Wordsworth and poet, said the imagination is “esemplastic”—it shapes and informs our experiences.

Faith without an imagination is a kind of vague hope—a desperate trust. Our religious life without imagination is an exercise in patience, a plodding, trekking towards something about as real as a mirage.

Last night Elder Eyring added pictures to his Christmas devotional message. What happened?  We see Mary now. Beautiful, pure, dark hair [of course, she lives in Palestine], her skin clear [but not as brown as it really was]. We see the authentic looking blue dress. We see Gabriel enveloped in light, speaking. We watch Mary journey to Elizabeth, managing her own miracle. Mary lays her head in her cousin’s lap. Two women bound together for cosmic comfort—a moment in a sand-swept village, flies buzzing, the simple bread lunch and a small glass of wine.

Wombs of destiny.